![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:12 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I'm doing government, and I'm taking a quiz on voting and the history of voters rights etc., and this question comes up
this seems rather sexist to me
Thanks K12!
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:16 |
|
If it was back in the 1910s or earlier that actually could be a reason. Remember women voting didn't become a thing until 1920.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:18 |
|
I know that, but just how it was worded seemed odd to me, she was put on trial "for being a woman" thats like saying I should join the army "because I'm a guy"
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:20 |
|
It's not exactly wrong.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:22 |
|
The wording is certainly strange. I guess I read it as "for being a women and voting"
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:24 |
|
in what way?
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:27 |
|
She wasn't allowed to vote because she was a woman.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:29 |
|
Answer is: For having a $1 coin named after her that nobody ever used.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:29 |
|
Was it uniform? Here in canada it went province by province.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:31 |
|
don't laugh , if Republicans had their way , only Republicans would be allow to vote.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:31 |
|
Im sure it seemed considerably more sexist to Ms. Anthony at the time.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:32 |
|
I'm pretty sure it was a nationwide thing.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:32 |
|
Well on the 2nd point you should :P JK
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:33 |
|
I understand that, just the wording of the question sounded rather odd to me. she was put on trial for being a woman,
not for being a woman and casting an illegal vote.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:34 |
|
it was nationwide, the 19th amendment gave all women the right to vote
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:35 |
|
just for your information, I am a republican... and I don't think that way.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:36 |
|
maybe i'm thinking of the tea party fringe element
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:37 |
|
The western territories were ahead of the game in voting rights, though, similar to how the states are slowly passing marriage equality one-by-one nowadays.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:37 |
|
I'm sure that is very true.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:40 |
|
computer generated shit test?
Thats the beauty of education, no need to know anything about the actual situation just the multiple choice answer.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:40 |
|
I am a moderate right though, not a far far right. I do see where you are coming from, some the people in the republican party have.... interesting beliefs and actions (Case-and-point, one of the republican governer canidates for this state (Idaho) changed his legal name to Pro-Life).
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:41 |
|
yep, I got 100% on the quiz!
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:44 |
|
I don't actually know the last time I actually saw a $1 coin, and I think the last time I saw a 50 cent coin was like 3 years ago, I see canadian money far more often than I see dollar coins or 50 cent coins.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:48 |
|
ITT: people who have trouble with standardized tests
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:54 |
|
The US tried to emulate countries like Canada and issued a $1 coin in 1979. It was not well received because it looked much like a Quarter and was used as such a lot of the time. It was followed by the Sacagawea dollar coin, which failed as well. Americans wanted a big coin, like the old silver dollar if they were going to accept a $1 coin.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 20:59 |
|
It's not exactly an incorrect answer. She cast an illegal vote. Her vote was illegal because of her gender. So essentially, she WAS actually put on trial as a direct result of being a woman. It's not the wording that's confusing, it's that you're having trouble reconciling that anachronistic idea with today.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 21:10 |
|
It's just the obvious wrong choice of your multi choice selection.
![]() 11/24/2014 at 21:26 |
|
And people wonder why I write most of the tests I give.
![]() 11/28/2014 at 16:05 |
|
If she had tried to prove she was a man, her vote would have been legal. Therefore, her womanhood was kinda on trial.